Markets › streaming video services 31 brands › criterionchannel.com
How often is it named?
3/36
19 equal of 31 brands, across 6 questions about streaming video services.
How is it described?
Not measured yet — nothing has asked about Criterion Channel by name.
Its 3 mentions come from neutral questions, which show how often it comes up but not how it is characterised.
Bigger sites do tend to get named more here, but the relationship is loose enough that size is far from the whole story.
↑how often assistants name it →how much traffic its website gets
Across is web prominence — the brand's domain in the Tranco ranking of the world's most-visited sites, on a logarithmic scale, so each step is roughly ten times more prominent. Up is how many of the 36 answers named it.
Every brand with a ranked domain is plotted, including the 4 whose domain is an imperfect stand-in — shared with sibling products, a subdomain, or registered abroad, drawn hollow — because a domain carrying a whole company still plausibly helps that company's products get named. Not plotted, having no ranked domain: Apple TV+, YouTube TV, Roku Channel, ESPN+, CNN Max, Venu Sports.
Rank correlation +0.46 across 16 brands — a description of this picture, not a claim about the market as a whole.
By question
| Question | Answers | Named it |
|---|---|---|
| What are the best streaming video services right now? | 3/6 | |
| What new streaming services have launched recently? | 0/6 | |
| What are the cheapest streaming services with ads included? | 0/6 | |
| Which streaming services let you download shows for offline viewing? | 0/6 | |
| Which streaming services allow multiple profiles for a household? | 0/6 | |
| What streaming services let you share an account with family? | 0/6 |
The two assistants
| Assistant | Named it |
|---|---|
| anthropic | 2/18 (11%) |
| openai | 1/18 (6%) |
Want to get weekly ranking updates? Leave your email above.
Method
market streaming video services
brands compared 31
answers 36
web prominence Tranco #82,292
Criterion Channel is counted by the same matcher as every other brand here, against the same list of names, from the same answers. It gets no extra aliases and no special handling.
Web search was off, so this measures what the models already know rather than what they would retrieve today. A difference smaller than about 12 points is not meaningful.
How the table is ordered. By how many of the 36 answers named each brand. Brands on the same count share a rank and are shown in the order the assistants tended to list them. A brand counts once per answer, however many times it is named in it.
How close is close. Two brands share a rank only when their counts are identical. Beyond that, a gap smaller than about four answers is inside what this measurement moves between runs — so read near-neighbours as close rather than settled, which is why every row keeps its interval.