aisnoopy team messaging apps

Markets team messaging apps 38 brands teams.microsoft.com

Microsoft Teams

How often is it named?

36/36

1 equal of 38 brands, across 6 questions about team messaging apps.

How is it described?

Not measured yet — nothing has asked about Microsoft Teams by name.

Its 36 mentions come from neutral questions, which show how often it comes up but not how it is characterised.

Also named in 2 other markets.

+22 more brands named at least once ranked below the top 13
14 GitHubgithub.com 1028%
16= Zoomzoom.us 822%
16= Trellotrello.com 822%
16= Linearlinear.app 822%
22= Miromiro.com 617%
22= Twisttwist.com 617%
25= Figmafigma.com 514%
27= Zulipzulip.com 38%
30= ClickUp Chatclickup.com 26%
30= Wrikewrike.com 26%
30= Zoho Cliqzoho.com 26%
33= Signalsignal.org 13%
33= Webexwebex.com 13%
33= Zoho Projectszoho.com 13%

3 brands in this market were named in none of the 36 answers: Jitsi Meet, Lark, Nextcloud Talk.

Being a big website barely predicts being named here. The assistants are drawing on something other than raw web prominence.

how often assistants name it how much traffic its website gets

Slack Discord Microsoft 365 Notion Mattermost Asana Monday.com Gmail Rocket.Chat GitHub Zoom Jira Trello ClickUp Linear Miro 36/36 18/36 0/36 smaller sites bigger sites
Top left — punching above their sizea small site, named often
Bottom right — overlooked despite their sizea big site, named rarely
How to read this chart

Across is web prominence — the brand's domain in the Tranco ranking of the world's most-visited sites, on a logarithmic scale, so each step is roughly ten times more prominent. Up is how many of the 36 answers named it.

Every brand with a ranked domain is plotted, including the 2 whose domain is an imperfect stand-in — shared with sibling products, a subdomain, or registered abroad, drawn hollow — because a domain carrying a whole company still plausibly helps that company's products get named. The 6 least-named brands are left off so the rest can be labelled; the table above has every one of them. Not plotted, having no ranked domain: Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, Google Chat, Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive and 1 more.

Rank correlation +0.12 across 16 brands — a description of this picture, not a claim about the market as a whole.

By question

QuestionAnswersNamed it
What are the best team messaging apps right now? 6/6
What tools work well for small startup teams to chat? 6/6
Which team messaging tool has the most reliable notifications? 6/6
What platforms let remote teams collaborate in real time? 6/6
Which tool has the best search for old messages and files? 6/6
What are good alternatives for organizing team tasks and chat together? 6/6

Where it lands when answers rank brands

median position 2 of about 10
in the top three 81% of ranked answers
from 36 ranked answers
95% interval 90–100% on its own count

The two assistants

AssistantNamed it
anthropic 18/18 (100%)
openai 18/18 (100%)

Also named in

Microsoft Teams across all 3 markets →

Want to get weekly ranking updates? Leave your email above.

Method

market team messaging apps
brands compared 38
answers 36
owned by Microsoft

Microsoft Teams is counted by the same matcher as every other brand here, against the same list of names, from the same answers. It gets no extra aliases and no special handling.

Web search was off, so this measures what the models already know rather than what they would retrieve today. A difference smaller than about 12 points is not meaningful.

How the table is ordered. By how many of the 36 answers named each brand. Brands on the same count share a rank and are shown in the order the assistants tended to list them. A brand counts once per answer, however many times it is named in it.

How close is close. Two brands share a rank only when their counts are identical. Beyond that, a gap smaller than about four answers is inside what this measurement moves between runs — so read near-neighbours as close rather than settled, which is why every row keeps its interval.