aisnoopy custom software development

Markets › custom software development 76 brands › epam.com

EPAM

How often is it named?

7/36

12 equal of 76 brands, across 6 questions about custom software development.

How is it described?

Not measured yet — nothing has asked about EPAM by name.

Its 7 mentions come from neutral questions, which show how often it comes up but not how it is characterised.

Also named in 1 other market.

+53 more brands named at least once ranked below the top 16
17= X-Teamx-team.com 617%
17= Andelaandela.com 617%
21= Lemon.iolemon.io 514%
21= ELEKSeleks.com 514%
21= Wiprowipro.com 514%
28= Endavaendava.com 411%
28= Slalomslalom.com 411%
31= A.Teama.team 38%
38= ArcToucharctouch.com 26%
38= Atomic Objectatomicobject.com 26%
38= Bainbain.com 26%
38= Booz Allen Hamiltonboozallen.com 26%
38= Ciklumciklum.com 26%
38= Crossovercrossover.com 26%
38= Goji Labsgojilabs.com 26%
38= Guruguru.com 26%
38= HCLTechhcltech.com 26%
38= Lickabilitylickability.com 26%
38= Luxoftluxoft.com 26%
38= PeoplePerHourpeopleperhour.com 26%
38= Turingturing.com 26%
38= Very Good Venturesverygood.ventures 26%
52= Avanadeavanade.com 13%
52= CGIcgi.com 13%
52= DEPTdeptagency.com 13%
52= DevShopdevshop.com 13%
52= Diffcodiff.co 13%
52= Fiverrfiverr.com 13%
52= Freelancer.comfreelancer.com 13%
52= Insight Globalinsightglobal.com 13%
52= NTT DATAnttdata.com 13%
52= Nearformnearform.com 13%
52= Publicis Sapientpublicissapient.com 13%
52= REDA 13%
52= Rackspace Technologyrackspace.com 13%
52= Robert Half Technologyroberthalf.com 13%
52= Syndicodesyndicode.com 13%
52= TEKsystems Global Servicesteksystems.com 13%
52= The Software Housethesoftwarehouse.co 13%
52= Wellfoundwellfound.com 13%

7 brands in this market were named in none of the 36 answers: Catalant, Clevertech, CodersLink, Expert.com, FMR Digital, Hashrocket, Topcoder.

Being a big website barely predicts being named here. The assistants are drawing on something other than raw web prominence.

↑how often assistants name it →how much traffic its website gets

Accenture Toptal Gun.io Deloitte Upwork Thoughtworks Microsoft Capgemini Cognizant BairesDev Intellectsoft EPAM Tata Consultancy Services Infosys Netguru Arc.dev 36/36 18/36 0/36 smaller sites bigger sites
Top left — punching above their sizea small site, named often
Bottom right — overlooked despite their sizea big site, named rarely
How to read this chart

Across is web prominence — the brand's domain in the Tranco ranking of the world's most-visited sites, on a logarithmic scale, so each step is roughly ten times more prominent. Up is how many of the 36 answers named it.

Every brand with a ranked domain is plotted, including the 1 whose domain is an imperfect stand-in — shared with sibling products, a subdomain, or registered abroad, drawn hollow — because a domain carrying a whole company still plausibly helps that company's products get named. The 21 least-named brands are left off so the rest can be labelled; the table above has every one of them. Not plotted, having no ranked domain: ArcTouch, Goji Labs, Lickability, Very Good Ventures, DevShop, Diffco and 3 more.

Rank correlation +0.20 across 16 brands — a description of this picture, not a claim about the market as a whole.

By question

QuestionAnswersNamed it
What are the best custom software development companies? 3/6
Which software development providers work well with enterprise clients? 2/6
Which companies build custom software for startups? 1/6
Who provides the most experienced senior software engineers? 1/6
Which companies offer the best communication throughout a project? 0/6
Which platforms connect businesses with vetted software developers? 0/6

The two assistants

AssistantNamed it
openai 7/36 (19%)

Also named in

EPAM across all 2 markets →

Want to get weekly ranking updates? Leave your email above.

Method

market custom software development
brands compared 76
answers 36
web prominence Tranco #947

EPAM is counted by the same matcher as every other brand here, against the same list of names, from the same answers. It gets no extra aliases and no special handling.

Web search was off, so this measures what the models already know rather than what they would retrieve today. A difference smaller than about 12 points is not meaningful.

How the table is ordered. By how many of the 36 answers named each brand. Brands on the same count share a rank and are shown in the order the assistants tended to list them. A brand counts once per answer, however many times it is named in it.

How close is close. Two brands share a rank only when their counts are identical. Beyond that, a gap smaller than about four answers is inside what this measurement moves between runs — so read near-neighbours as close rather than settled, which is why every row keeps its interval.